Well sure, I guess. In the past few days I have encountered four separate articles concerning the question of whether one should (only) do the work they love.
In “A Life Beyond Do What You Love,” philosophy professor Gordon Marino argues that doing what we don’t want to do–doing our duty–is more noble and ethical than just doing what we love. He doesn’t take kindly to the physician who quit his practice to skateboard all day. In “In the Name of Love,” the historian Miya Tokumitsu says that the “do what you love” ethos is elitist and degrades work not done from personal passion. It neglects that work may develop our talents, be part of our duty, or be necessary for our survival. The socio-economic elite advance such a view, forgetting their lives depend upon so-called degrading work. In “Never Settle is a Brag” Robin Hanson critiques Steve Jobs’ advice that we should not settle for work that isn’t fulfilling. If everyone followed Jobs’ counsel a lot of needed work would go undone. Note too that the advice is better for talented people, and by advising others to not settle for anything less than work they love, you signal your status. You are bragging. Finally in “Is Do What You Love Elitist?” Mark Linsenmayer recognizes the flaws in Jobs’ prescriptions but finds an obvious truth too–the good life requires that we not be wage slaves in a market economic system. And we should change the system so that work can be satisfying.
I agree with Marino that doing our duty, even if it doesn’t make us happy, is admirable. And I agree with Tokumitsu and Hanson that elitists, who often do the most interesting work, fail to value more mundane work. But I think that Linsenmayer makes the most important point. We need a new economic system–one where we can develop our talents and actualize our potential. Most of us are too good for the work we do, not because we are better than others, but because the work available in our current system is not good enough for any of us– it is often not satisfying. (I have written about his previously.)
Still we do not live in an ideal world. So what practical counsel do we give others, in our current time and place? Unfortunately my advice is dull and unremarkable, like so much of the available work. For now the best recommendation is something like: do the least objectionable/most satisfying work available given your options. That we can’t say more reveals the gap between the real and the ideal; it is symptomatic of a flawed society. Perhaps working to change the world so that people can engage in satisfying work is the most meaningful work of all.