Superintelligences Are Already Out There!

Progress in machine classification of images. The error rate of AI by year. Red line – the error rate of a trained human

“I think it very likely—in fact, inevitable—that biological intelligence is only a transitory
phenomenon… If we ever encounter extraterrestrial intelligence, I believe it is very likely to be postbiological in nature …” Paul Davies

Maddie Stone wrote a provocative piece today at Motherboard: “The Dominant Life Form in the Cosmos Is Probably Superintelligent Robots.” It begins in dramatic form:

If and when we finally encounter aliens, they probably won’t look like little green men, or spiny insectoids. It’s likely they won’t be biological creatures at all, but rather, advanced robots that outstrip our intelligence in every conceivable way. While scores of philosophers, scientists and futurists have prophesied the rise of artificial intelligence and the impending singularity, most have restricted their predictions to Earth. Fewer thinkers—outside the realm of science fiction, that is—have considered the notion that artificial intelligence is already out there, and has been for eons.

Stone notes that prominent thinkers who espouse this view, that the dominant intelligence in the cosmos is probably artificial, include: Seth Shostak, director of NASA’s Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence program; the esteemed astrobiologist Paul Davies; Library of Congress Chair in Astrobiology Stephen Dick; and the philosopher Susan Schneider. Her recent paper, “Alien Minds,” describes why alien life forms are likely to be synthetic, not biological.

As increasing evidence shows potentially habitable worlds strewn across the galaxy, it appears less likely that we are alone. But what would encounters with intelligent life forms be like? Schneider answers:

Everything about their cognition—how their brains receive and process information, what their goals and incentives are—could be vastly different from our own … Astrobiologists need to start thinking about the possibility of very different modes of cognition.

Thus the case for artificial superintelligence. If we are to communicate with them, if we are to survive our encounter with them, we need to develop artificial superintelligence.

There’s an important distinction here from just ‘artificial intelligence’ … I’m not saying that we’re going to be running into IBM processors in outer space. In all likelihood, this intelligence will be way more sophisticated than anything humans can understand.

Advanced civilizations probably moved quickly from radio to computers to AI to superintelligence at which point biological brains would be obsolete. Schneider notes the rapidly expanding world of brain-computer interface technology, including DARPA’s ElectRX neural implant program is evidence that the singularity is near. She predicts that we will upgrade our minds with technology, eventually switching to synthetic hardware. “It could be that by the time we actually encounter other intelligences, most humans will have substantially enhanced their brains,” Schneider said.

Still, we may be too late. If we encounter other intelligences they will probably be millions of years older than we are, they will already be artificial superintelligences according to many astronomers. As Seth Shostak puts it:

The way you reach this conclusion is very straightforward … Consider the fact that any signal we pick up has to come from a civilization at least as advanced as we are. Now, let’s say, conservatively, the average civilization will use radio for 10,000 years. From a purely probabilistic point of view, the chance of encountering a society far older than ourselves is quite high.

Our intelligence may be trivial compared to other intelligences in the universe. Moreover, there is good reason to think these intelligences would be conscious, independent of the substrate on which consciousness runs:

I don’t see any good reason to believe an artificial superintelligence couldn’t possess consciousness … I believe the brain is inherently computational—we already have computational theories that describe aspects of consciousness, including working memory and attention … Given a computational brain, I don’t see any good argument that silicon, instead of carbon, can’t be an excellent medium for experience.

Granted the idea that the heavens are teeming with superintelligent AIs is speculative, but it has practical consequences as Shostak notes:

So far, we’ve pointed antennas at stars that might have planets that might have breathable atmospheres and oceans and so forth … But if we’re correct that the dominant intelligence in the cosmos is artificial, then does it have to live on a planet with an ocean? … All artificial life forms would need is raw materials … They might be in deep space, hovering around a star, or feeding off a black hole’s energy at the center of the galaxy.

How then might superintelligent aliens view us? Will they see us as brothers of as biofuel? Schneider doesn’t think they’ll care: “If they were interested in us, we probably wouldn’t be here … My gut feeling is their goals and incentives are so different from ours, they’re not going to want to contact us.” Shostak agrees: “… We’re just too simplistic, too irrelevant. “You don’t spend a whole lot of time hanging out reading books with your goldfish. On the other hand, you don’t really want to kill the goldfish, either.”

The idea that aliens will be uninterested in us differs from Steven Hawking’s claim that advanced aliens might want to kill us. Either way, we should probably continue to upgrade our intelligence. That way, if we encounter superintelligences bent on our destruction, asteroids hurling toward earth, or out of control climate change, our intelligence will increase our chances of surviving the encounter.

Liked it? Take a second to support Dr John Messerly on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

4 thoughts on “Superintelligences Are Already Out There!

  1. This ignores the possibility that a superintelligence might only be a way-station to a super conscious, which probably would probably be interested in “moving on” to whatever the next (unconceivable) stage in evolution would be, probably beyond the artificial space/time universe we live in, so it would not have any relevance to our lives. Also, if there were superintelligence in the universe, wouldn’t there be some evidence? As usual, only speculations without any data.

    Also, the idea that these super intelligent robots exist “for eons” ignores our own evolutionary history, with advanced life forms only existing since 600 million years ago. If other planets experienced a similar history – why wouldn’t they? – then how could they leapfrog from molds and sponges to advanced computers hundreds of millions of years before we developed computers?

    Still – an interesting article. It raises important and interesting questions.

  2. When contemplating the possibilities and outcomes of future scientific development, it might be wiser to look toward those who have used their intelligence and creativity in the pursuit of what lies ahead. Not that current scientists are unable to extrapolate the progression of scientific and technological developments but their focus on the small steps needed to expand our collective knowledge demands that they keep both feet firmly planted in reality. They are not afforded the luxury of jumping off cliffs or postulating wild ideas to a group of critics and having those ideas pounded into so much blither as are those in the field of science fiction writing.

    While there are many other examples of the progression of intelligence and the use of artificial, digital devices that rise to the level of super intelligence and supreme control, the personal experience of reading Isaac Assimov’s “The Last Question” was not only profound in my early development of who we are/might be and what we are destined to become, it was a touchstone in my young minds conclusion that there was little to gain in clinging to the trappings of religious doctrine that stifled our ability to wonder at the origins of our universe and what our reasons for existence truly might turn out to be, or not to be.

  3. Another thing, these conjectures about super-intelligence are not super imagative. If there was a super-intelligence, it would probably have started monitoring us millions of years ago, and would multiple and second-by-second monitoring of each person on this planet (for various reasons). Also, this would probably entail multiple intelligences, including cooperative and competing super-beings.

  4. In fact, each person could be a battleground between conflicting superintelligences. This could explain such human behaviors as inspiration, dreams, madness, genius, and evil. Voices in your head? Maybe they are “real”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.