Summary of Viktor Frankl on “Tragic Optimism”

Viktor Frankl2.jpg

Viktor Emil Frankl M.D., PhD. (1905–1997) was an Austrian neurologist and psychiatrist as well as a Holocaust survivor. He was the founder of logotherapy, a form of Existential Analysis, and author of Man’s Search for Meaning, which has sold over 12 million copies. According to a survey conducted by the Library of Congress and the Book-of-the-Month Club, it is one of “the ten most influential books in America.” (I have taught out of it in many university classes, and it is one of my favorite books. I have summarized it here.)

The postscript to that book was titled, “Tragic Optimism.” It was added in 1984 and is based on a lecture Frankl presented at the Third World Congress of Logotherapy, Regensburg University, West Germany, in June 1983. Here are its main ideas.

Frankl begins like this:

“Let us first ask ourselves what should be understood by “a tragic optimism.” In brief it means that one is, and remains, optimistic in spite of the “tragic triad,” … a triad which consists of … (1) pain; (2) guilt; and (3) death. This … raises the question, How is it possible to say yes to life in spite of all that?  How … can life retain its potential meaning in spite of its tragic aspects? After all, “saying yes to life in spite of everything,” …presupposes that life is potentially meaningful under any conditions, even those which are most miserable. And this in turn presupposes the human capacity to creatively turn life’s negative aspects into something positive or constructive. In other words, what matters is to make the best of any given situation. … hence the reason I speak of a tragic optimism … an optimism in the face of tragedy and in view of the human potential which at its best always allows for: (1) turning suffering into a human achievement and accomplishment; (2) deriving from guilt the opportunity to change oneself for the better; and (3) deriving from life’s transitoriness an incentive to take responsible action.

Of course, you can’t force someone to be optimistic, any more than you can force them to be happy. Rather, you need a reason to be happy, just like you need a reason to laugh or smile. Give someone a reason to be happy or laugh or smile and they will. Try to force them to and they will show fake happiness or forced laughter or an unnatural smile.

Real happiness comes when we find meaning in our lives—meaning provides the reason to be happy despite the tragic triad. Without meaning, we give up. And this meaninglessness often lies behind our experiences of 1) depression; 2) aggression; and 3) addiction. Now we can trace many neuroses to biochemical conditions, but Frankl believed that often their origins derive from a sense of meaninglessness.

As a therapist, Frankl was “concerned with the potential meaning inherent and dormant in all the single situations one has to face throughout his or her life,” rather than trying to understand the meaning of life as a whole. He was not suggesting there is no meaning to an entire human life, but that this final meaning depends “on whether or not the potential meaning of every single situation has been actualized …” In other words: “the perception of meaning … boils down to becoming aware of a possibility against the background of reality or … becoming aware of what can be done about a given situation.”

But how do we find meaning in our lives? Frankl reiterates that there are three main sources of meaning in life: 1) creating a work or doing a deed;  2) experiencing something or encountering someone (as in love);  and 3) transcending, learning, and finding meaning from the inevitable suffering that we will experience. Thus, Frankl argues, we can find meaning despite the tragic triad of suffering, guilt, and death.

As for suffering, Frankl doesn’t claim that we must suffer to discover meaning, but that meaning can be found despite, or even because of, suffering. Here he reminds me of the Stoics: “If it [suffering] is avoidable, the meaningful thing to do is to remove its cause, for unnecessary suffering is masochistic rather than heroic. If, on the other hand, one cannot change a situation that causes his suffering, he can still choose his attitude.” We might not have chosen to break our necks, but we can choose, as far as possible, to not let that experience break us. As for guilt, we overcome it primarily by taking responsibility for our actions, rising above guilt, and transforming ourselves for the better.

As for death, the ephemeral nature of life should remind us that we are dying every moment, and therefore we should make good use of our time. This leads to Frankl’s imperative: “Live as if you were living for the second time and had acted as wrongly the first time as you are about to act now.” In other words, live your life as if you were getting a second chance to correct all the mistakes you made in your first life:

… as soon as we have used an opportunity and have actualized a potential meaning, we have done so once and for all. We have rescued it into the past wherein it has been safely delivered and deposited. In the past, nothing is irretrievably lost, but rather, on the contrary, everything is irrevocably stored and treasured. To be sure, people tend to see only the stubble fields of transitoriness but overlook and forget the full granaries of the past into which they have brought the harvest of their lives: the deeds done, the loves loved, and last but not least, the sufferings they have gone through with courage and dignity.

Surprisingly these considerations lead him to a profound thought which provides a great tonic to those worried about time’s passing:

From this one may see that there is no reason to pity old people. Instead, young people should envy them. It is true that the old have no opportunities, no possibilities in the future. But they have more than that. Instead of possibilities in the future, they have realities in the past—the potentialities they have actualized, the meanings they have fulfilled, the values they have realized—and nothing and nobody can ever remove these assets from the past.

Frankl further argues that society mistakenly adores achievement, success, happiness, and youth. However, the quest for meaning is the most worthwhile pursuit and the only way to true happiness. Life’s tragedies—pain, guilt, and death—may lead to meaninglessness, but they don’t have to. We can be optimistic. We can find meaning through our work, our relationships, and by nobly bearing our suffering.

Liked it? Take a second to support Dr John Messerly on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

6 thoughts on “Summary of Viktor Frankl on “Tragic Optimism”

  1. You summarise Frank’s survivalist optimism by concluding that the complex need for meaning in our particular existence can be found in work, relationships and a noble attitude towards suffering in a general sense. This strikes me as a rather, let me say, protestant, or rather pessimistic approach and with that a reduced conclusion of both his personal experiences, the report he spread from that and the therapy that he eventually developed to help and assist a crowd of individuals that have been collectively been searching for just that for ages: why should I live and not die? I think, whereas you have quite pointedly reviewed Schopenhauer’s nihilism that can lead to an optimistic outlook (I must speak for myself in this) you clearly miss out on the quintessential point that Frankl keeps making about own’s own responsibility, as a means of an ambitious, spiritual, religious or simply empowering force that can negate all individual despair and not replace it but respond to it with an attitude that is free from guilt, shame and regret. It is in essence a liberating mentality that he propagates as an answer to everyday’s burden or suffering, – not that of the minion that strives to survive just for the sake of it. Regards,

  2. “My dear Lucilius I am glad that you are persisting in your efforts to acquire a sound understanding, There is no need to go before the image of some idol, or raise our hands to Heaven, there exists within you a divine spirit”: and if you ever come across a man who is calm in the midst of storms, and never alarmed by dangers, you can be sure that this is the beam of Divinity within a mortal body ” Seneca Epistles

    Great Article–I like Dr. Frankl’s thinking

  3. Love this post! Thank you!

    What is the source of the quote when you write, ‘Here he reminds me of the Stoics: “If it [suffering] is avoidable…”?

  4. Part III – The Case for Tragic Optimism from Man’s Search For Meaning,
    (New York: Washington Square Books, 1984)

    “As we see, the priority stays with creatively changing the situation that causes us to suffer. But the superiority goes to the ‘know-how to suffer,’ if need be. . . .” pp. 171-172

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.