The above video suggests that time speeds up as you age.
On first reflection, this seems true. I’m 67, and time seems to pass faster now than when I was younger. As a child a day in school seemed to take forever, but so too did summer vacation. Today a school year seems to fly by for this professor. When I was a kid I thought something twenty years ago was prehistoric, now twenty years ago was 2002. And 2002 seems downright futuristic compared to the 1960s I remember.
But do we really experience time moving faster as we age? Probably not. BBC science writer Claudia Hammond’s recent article suggests that the idea that time accelerates as we age is mostly a myth. We measure time’s objective passing about the same at any age. But, as she says in her book, Time Warped: Unlocking the mysteries of Time Perception, the experience of time’s passing “depends on the time frame you are considering. In time perception studies, adults in a mid-life report that the hours and days pass at what feels like a normal speed; it is the years that flash by.”
Hammond believes this is because we assess time in two different ways. We can look at how fast time seems to pass in the present, or we can look retrospectively at how fast previous years or decades seemed to pass. Looked at retrospectively, time seems to go faster as we age. “The days still feel as though they pass at an average speed, but we’re surprised when markers of time indicated how many months and years have passed or at how quickly birthdays come round yet again.” But why? Hammond hypothesizes:
Part of the reason is that as we get older life inevitably brings fewer fresh experiences, and more routines. Because we use the number of new memories we form to gauge how much time has passed, an average week that doesn’t loom large in the memory gives the illusion that time is shrinking.
To combat this phenomenon Hammond suggests we fill our time with new experiences. On the other hand, “we do have to ask ourselves whether we really want to slow time down. If you look at the circumstances where evidence tells us that time goes slowly, they include having a very high temperature, feeling rejected and experiencing depression.”
Richard A. Friedman, a professor of clinical psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College has also found that the idea that objective time is speeding up as you age is illusory. “On the whole, most of us perceive short intervals of time similarly, regardless of age.” However, “when researchers asked the subjects about the 10-year interval, older subjects were far more likely than the younger subjects to report that the last decade had passed quickly.” So “Why … do older people look back at long stretches of their lives and feel it’s a race to the finish?”
Friedman’s answer is similar to Hammond’s. When you are younger “you are forming a fairly steady stream of new memories of events, places and people.” Then as an adult when “you look back at your childhood experiences, they appear to unfold in slow motion probably because the sheer number of them gives you the impression that they must have taken forever to acquire.”
But this is merely an illusion, the way adults understand the past when they look through the telescope of lost time. This, though, is not an illusion: almost all of us faced far steeper learning curves when we were young. Most adults do not explore and learn about the world the way they did when they were young; adult life lacks the constant discovery and endless novelty of childhood.
“Studies have shown that the greater the cognitive demands of a task, the longer its duration is perceived to be,” so perhaps ” learning new things might slow down our internal sense of time.” This may also be part of the solution to the apparent speeding up of time as we age:
if you want time to slow down, become a student again. Learn something that requires sustained effort; do something novel. Put down the thriller when you’re sitting on the beach and break out a book on evolutionary theory or Spanish for beginners or a how-to book on something you’ve always wanted to do. Take a new route to work; vacation at an unknown spot. And take your sweet time about it.
I think this is right. We can squeeze a bit more out of life by continually developing. After all, the art of staying young is in large part a matter of continually learning new truths, and unlearning old falsehoods.
What would this imply for the perceived passage of time for immortal post-humans? I suppose it could go both ways: if we can constantly learn then immortality would pass slowly (upon reflection) or we could become habituated and the millennia would fly by…
Really interesting idea. If we are continually evolving—intellectually, morally, psychologically—we would live well in the present and time would seem full retrospectively. That is time would have seemed to have passed slowly in retrospect, but slow in a good way. Our descendents would recall fondly all that time that was well spent. If we ceased to evolve, then time would have been spent poorly and in retrospect millennia would seemed to have passed in an instant. This might lead to the boredom situation so many worry about.
The researcher wrote: “The days still feel as though they pass at an average speed”. That is not my experience, at all. I often wake up early in the morning, and on most days it feels as if I just turn around and it’s time to go to sleep again. I observe the sun rising and setting at shocking speeds.
“Hammond hypothesizes:
Part of the reason is that as we get older life inevitably brings fewer fresh experiences, and more routines.”.
This was already explained by Schopenhauer, a VERY long ago (pun intended). He wrote something like this:
“When we are children, everything seems and feels new and interesting. As we age, we notice things around us less and less, until we hardly care about them anymore. Also, a year for a five years old is a fifth of an entire life; at 50, a year feels as it were a far smaller fraction.”.
—
Therefore he didn’t say that time goes faster IN REALITY, but that our perception of it changes. Which brings us to the question: does it really makes a difference? Colours do not objectively exists in reality: they are a result of light reflecting on a surface, etc. But as Russell said: “In the end, I came to realize that the grass really is green”.
Thanks for the great article!
Hammond: “we do have to ask ourselves whether we really want to slow time down. If you look at the circumstances where evidence tells us that time goes slowly, they include having a very high temperature, feeling rejected and experiencing depression.”
A bit like when a person wearing rags is telling to another wearing rags: “well, would you really be rich? After all, it’s not of much use”.
Some people just don’t get this stuff, for example, Hammond in my view does not understand that “time going faster” for most people, especially for philosophers, creates a direct implication that life is extremely short, and that it will be over sooner than it seems.
As for feelings of rejection, I can get over these far more easily. A philosopher should know and accept the fact that rejection is simply part and parcel of life. That is the problem of most of these scientists….there are notable exceptions, such as Stephen Hawking and a few others, but usually their scientific and empirical knowledge is far more advanced that their philosophical skills.
” After all, the art of staying young is in large part a matter of continually learning new truths, and unlearning old falsehoods.”.
Perfectly said. I liken this to, pardon me the expression, giving the middle finger to our “taskmaster with a whip!” as Schopenhauer called Time.